Solutions
Agent count against home sales is the whole story. Fast-growing metros add buyers faster than agents.
Real estate is the most crowded local category on this list. Agent counts run far ahead of most trades, transactions are cyclical, and a large share of licensees do very little volume, so headline agent numbers overstate the real competition. The report counts brokerages from live listings rather than counting licensees, which is a truer read of who you would actually compete with.
Demand is set by household formation and turnover rather than by population alone. Neighborhood home values matter twice over, because they drive both the commission on a transaction and the kind of client the market produces.
Is there room for another brokerage here, and what would it be worth?
We measured these from live business listings across six mid-size metros and from published federal business statistics. They are the yardstick every scan is scored against, so a city reading above or below them is the actual signal.
In a city of 250,000 that works out to roughly 210 brokerages sharing a market of about $49M a year. Your city will differ, which is the point of scanning it.
Every figure names its source and shows the arithmetic behind it, so you can argue with any input rather than taking a score on faith. See how the math is shown.
Brokerages opening an office, teams choosing a farm area, and agencies building real estate lead generation.
Brokerages. Counting licensed agents inflates the competitive picture, because a large share of licensees transact rarely or not at all.
No. It reports current values and ownership patterns by neighborhood. Price forecasting is a different discipline and anything claiming to do both is worth a second look.
In the keyword universe you can see rental and sales intent separately, which matters if you are weighing a property management arm.